Ecological economics in the stomach #2 Resources

Demand for resources

Whilst demand for food, feed and fibre may increase by 70% by 2050, 60% of the world’s major ecosystems that help produce these resources have already been degraded or are used unsustainably. If we carry on using resources at the current rate, by 2050 we will need, on aggregate, the equivalent of more than two planets to sustain us, and the aspirations of many for a better quality of life will not be achieved.

Ecological analysis of CO 2 in an ecosystem
Image via Wikipedia

The problem with our economic system today is that it still encourages the inefficient use of resources by pricing some below true costs. We also can find not equally taxed products which will make a difference.

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development estimates that by 2050 we will need a 4 to 10 fold increase in resource efficiency, with significant improvements needed already by 2020. Some dynamic businesses have recognised the benefits of a more productive use of resources, yet many enterprises and consumers have not yet realised the scale and urgency of the required transformations. Promoting efficient use of resources makes a lot of business sense and should help improve their competitiveness and  profitability.

Resource efficiency

Between the countries at the continent there should be agreements about promoting certain products and prising. It should be an integral part of the EU’s agenda for global competitiveness to promote passive building, using ecological products and offering the public better opportunities to buy biological and locally grown products. It also helps ensure a sustainable recovery from the economic crisis and it can boost employment.

Scales and Processes of the Global Carbon Cycle

Transformation will need a policy framework that creates a playing field, where innovation
and resource efficiency are rewarded, creating economic opportunities and improved security of supply through product redesign, sustainable management of environmental resources, greater reuse, recycling and substitution of materials and resource savings. Decoupling growth from resource use and unlocking these new sources of growth needs coherence and integration in the policies that shape our economy and our lifestyles. Action on climate change has already led the way in helping to decouple growth from the use of carbon.

Attitude of the consumers

People should be made aware that they themselves can help to make a better world to live in. First of all there is their attitute to one each other and secondly their attitude to nature. Awarenes of their influence on the environment is a major point. Changing the consumption patterns of private and public purchasers will help drive resource efficiency and can also frequently generate direct net cost savings. In turn it can help increase demand for more resource efficient services and products. Accurate information, based on the life-cycle impacts and costs of resource use, is needed to help guide consumption decisions.
Consumers can save costs by avoiding waste themselves, and buying products that last, or that can be easily repaired or recycled. New entrepreneurial models, where products are leased rather than bought, can satisfy consumer needs with less life-cycle resource use.

Ecology Society Economy diagram Environment background
Ecology Society Economy diagram Environment background

Not necessary limitations

It is wrong to think that we would be more limited by using only products of our regions in the appropriate season. Not having tomatoes in Winter shall have require an other vegetable choice for that period but shall help that certain individuals shall not receive an allergic reaction to that product. today we do account too many allergic food reactions because those products were used in the wrong amount and at the wrong time in the life of the reacting person.

It is good that Europe has set a Milestone. It would like to see that by 2020, citizens and public authorities should have the right incentives to choose the most resource efficient products and services, through appropriate price signals and clear environmental information. Their purchasing choices will stimulate companies to innovate and to supply more resource efficient goods and services. Minimum environmental performance standards are set to remove the least resource efficient and most polluting products from the market. Consumer demand is high for more sustainable products and services.
Economic growth and well-being should be decoupled from resource inputs and come primarily from increases in the value of products and associated services.

Recycling and information

Improving the reuse of raw materials through greater ‘industrial symbiosis’ (where the waste of some firms is used as a resource for others) across the EU could save €1.4bn a year and generate €1.6bn in sales.

The public should know what they get on their plate. There should be uniformity in the information they can get on the packet of the products available. Therefore the European Union wants to establish a common methodological approach to enable Member States and the private sector to assess, display and benchmark the environmental performance of
products, services and companies based on a comprehensive assessment of environmental impacts over the life-cycle (‘environmental footprint‘) (in 2012); Address the  environmental footprint of products, building on an ongoing assessment due in 2012 and following a consultation with stakeholders, including through setting requirements under the Ecodesign directive, to boost the material resource efficiency of products (e.g.  reusability/recoverability/recyclability, recycled content, durability), and through expanding the scope of the Ecodesign directive to non-energy related products (in 2012).

Getting to the goal

To get easier to the goals Member States, with the Commission should as of 2012, assess:

Options to increase market rewards for genuinely environmentally friendly products;
• Measures to extend producer responsibility to the full life-cycle of the products they
make (including via new business models, through guidance on take-back and recycling schemes and support for repair services);
• Actions to optimise the resource efficiency of packaging.

Member States should:
• Put in place incentives that stimulate a large majority of companies to measure, benchmark and improve their resource efficiency systematically (continuous);
• Help companies work together to make the best use of the waste and by-products
they produce (e.g. by exploiting industrial symbiosis) (continuous);
• Ensure that advice and support is available to help SMEs identify and improve their
resource efficiency and sustainable use of raw materials (continuous);
• Work together with the Commission to ensure that, by 2020, all relevant Substances
of Very High Concern are placed on the REACH Candidate List (continuous).

It is nice to hear that in some Member States more than 80% of waste is recycled, indicating the possibilities of using waste as one of the EU’s key resources. Improving waste management makes better use of resources and can open up new markets and jobs, as well as encourage less dependence on imports of raw materials and lower impacts on the environment.
Recycling and re-use of waste are economically attractive options for public and private actors due to widespread separate collection and the development of functional markets for secondary raw materials. More materials, including materials having a significant impact on the environment and critical raw materials, should be recycled.
Waste legislation should become fully implemented. Illegal shipments of should become eradicated while energy recovery could be best limited to non recyclable materials, having landfilling virtually eliminated and high quality recycling being ensured.

All this would demand a change in the attitude of the consumer, who should be more aware of his impact on the environment and the economical impact of his consumerism as well.
those in charge should therefore try to stimulate the secondary materials market and demand for recycled materials through economic incentives and developing end-of-waste criteria (in 2013/2014).

Ecology Society Economy diagram Earth background

Sustainability diagram showing ecology, economy and society as interconnecting, and bound by Environment represented as Earth

The EU and its citizens

The European Commission will:

Review existing prevention, re-use, recycling, recovery and landfill diversion targets to move towards an economy based on re-use and recycling, with residual waste close to zero (in 2014);
• Assess the introduction of minimum recycled material rates, durability and reusability criteria and extensions of producer responsibility for key products (in 2012);
• Assess areas where legislation on the various waste streams could be aligned to improve coherence (in 2013/2014);
• Continue working within the EU and with international partners to eradicate illegal waste shipments with a special focus on hazardous waste;
• Ensure that public funding from the EU budget gives priority to activities higher up the waste hierarchy as defined in the Waste Framework Directive (e.g. priority to recycling plants over waste disposal) (in 2012/2013);
• Facilitate the exchange of best practice on collection and treatment of waste among Member States and develop measures to combat more effectively breaches of EU waste rules (in 2013/2014).
Member States should:
• ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis including minimum targets through their national waste prevention and management strategies (continuous).

The transition to a green and low-carbon economy will require significant innovation, from small incremental changes to major technological breakthroughs.

In the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe the European Commission presented a major breakthrough in a ‘life saving project’.

Download the report of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress
chaired by Professor Joseph E. Stiglitz, Columbia University. Professor Amartya Sen, Harvard University, was Chair Adviser. Professor Jean-Paul Fitoussi, Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris, President of the Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE), was Coordinator of the Commission. Members of the Commission are renowned experts from universities, governmental and intergovernmental organisations, in several countries (USA, France, United Kingdom, India). Rapporteurs and secretariat have been provided by the French national statistical institute (Insee), OFCE, and OECD.

+

The world will have to make farming more productive but less dependent on harmful chemicals, curb food losses and waste, protect the environment and reduce agriculture’s exposure to disastrous price swings.

+

To reach the goal in sustainability, rich countries in particular would have to reduce excessive consumption that leads to obesity and tackle loss and waste in food distribution and use that today runs at around 25 percent of production.

Agriculture everywhere would have to be more economical in fossil fuels and make less use of chemicals.

Genetic manipulation of plants to boost yields would be necessary. However, smarter ways of traditional cross-breeding are emerging as good alternatives to genetic engineering, which is a hot political issue in many countries.

There would have to be changes in trade rules so that the food supply line to importing countries becomes stronger and more resilient, thus easing the price shocks that hit producer or customer.

++

Previously: Ecological economics in the stomach #1 Alarmbell

Next: Ecological economics in the stomach #3 Food and Populace

+++

Related articles
  • Life Changes, Your Ecological Footprint Changes(apartmenttherapy.com)
    Have you been able to keep your footprint reasonable, despite life changes? Has your new home/city/job actually improved your footprint?+living responsibly and mindfully is what’s important. Yes, we can all change and be incredibly drastic in the way we live, or we can just stop adhering to practices that are obviously wasteful and neglectful of those around us, like everyone should probably start recycling, composting, riding a bike more often, eating less meat, and buying less “new” items, but not everyone can turn their carbon footprints to zero.
  • Planet Goes Into Ecological Debt(bigthink.com)
    “Human’s depend on the Earth for everything from food to fuel and clothing, but since the 1970′s humans have been using more resources than a single planet provides, the Network says. To keep up our current usage rates we would need between 1.3 to 1.5 Earths.” From rising food and fuel prices to climate change, we are suffering the consequences.
  • Earth’s Annual Resources Used Up Today, Group Says (livescience.com)The world’s 7 billionth person is likely to be born next month, according to estimates by the United Nations. Meanwhile, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) estimates that humans currently consume the equivalent of 1.5 planets’ worth of resources to maintain our activities.
  • Climate Change(gcamerica.wordpress.com)
    McKibben states “the fact that climatologists have been predicting for years that as we flood the atmosphere with carbon we will also start both drying and flooding the planet, since warm air holds more water vapor than cold air”.
  • Ecological Footprints and Pollution(pensci.wordpress.com)
    the average person is not very willing to stop using (most) technology that is commonly available.+“The process of repeating a behavior and still expecting a different result from your actions.”+Technology, something that keeps the world going today could in fact save the world we live in. (Mason R)+To make our footprint smaller, we have to start with ourselves and not leave it up to others to do the job for us. (Fallon S.)
  • Whither Ecological Limits? Jairam Ramesh, Economic Growth & Energy Expansion(treehugger.com)
    Without embedding the notion of ecological limit, as well as personal and communal limits, into economic thinking and policy India (as is every nation right now) is setting itself and ourselves up for further resource conflict and ecological collapse, either locally, globally, or both.
  • The ecological footprint of environment reporting | Adam Vaughan(guardian.co.uk)
    While we try to minimise the carbon impact of our reports from the frontlines of ecological battlefields, our reporters’ dispatches are simply too important to ignore
  • Ecological Intelligence: Gearing-up for Managing Sustainability Projects(brighthub.com)
    Consumers are being encouraged to become ecologically savvy in making informed buying decisions. Complete and comprehensive information contained in the product’s eco-label will serve as the bases for discerning sustainable values.
  • UK renewable energy subsidies slashed (guardian.co.uk)
    Public subsidies for a range of renewable energy technologies are to be cut under plans unveiled by the government on Thursday, as ministers respond to complaints of “green taxes” driving up energy bills.
  • Is it time to generate your own domestic power? (guardian.co.uk)
    We’d always recommend that before you invest in microgen technology you first address the energy efficiency of your property. It’s also important to make sure you choose the right technology for it to be effective – there’s no point installing a wind turbine unless you live somewhere windy (which rules out most urban locations) and the best results for solar pv [photovoltaics] are south-facing roofs.
  • Dramatically raising low metal recycling rates part of path to green economy: UNEP(eurekalert.org)
    several recommendations on how recycling could be boosted world-wide:Encouraging product design that makes disassembly and material separation easierImproving waste management and recycling infrastructure for complex end-of-life products in developing countries and emerging economiesIn industrialized countries, addressing the fact that many metal-containing products are ‘hibernating’ in places likes drawers and closets and others, such as mobile phones, are all too often ending up in dustbins.
  • Connecting Europe: The new EU core transport network(iewy.com)
    The Commission has today adopted a proposal to transform the existing patchwork of European roads, railways, airports and canals into a unified transport network (TEN-T). The new core network will remove bottlenecks, upgrade infrastructure and streamline cross border transport operations for passengers and businesses throughout the EU. It will improve connections between different modes of transport and contribute to the EU’s climate change objectives.
  • Sustainability Basic Information(thegreenmarketingcompany.wordpress.com)
    Everything that we need for our survival and well-being depends, either directly or indirectly, on our natural environment. Sustainability creates and maintains the conditions under which humans and nature can exist in productive harmony, that permit fulfilling the social, economic and other requirements of present and future generations.Sustainability is important to making sure that we have and will continue to have, the water, materials, and resources to protect human health and our environment.
  • Onondaga Nation, Ecologic Solutions Form Historic Green Business Partnership(indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com)
    “The Onondaga Nation and its people have a unique spiritual, cultural and historic relationship with the earth and the waters, which is embodied in Gayanashagowa, the Great Law of Peace,” Edwards said. “It is the duty of the Nation’s leaders to work for a healing of the earth, to protect it and pass it on to future generations. This partnership is about making a better world for the generations yet to come.”
  • UN Report Urges Global Dietary Changes(philipcarrgomm.wordpress.com) “Impacts from agriculture are expected to increase substantially due to population growth increasing consumption of animal products. Unlike fossil fuels, it is difficult to look for alternatives: people have to eat. A substantial reduction of impacts would only be possible with a substantial worldwide diet change, away from animal products.”
  • Can modernisation be “ecological”?(learningfromdogs.com)
    ‘…all ways out of the environmental crisis lead us further into modernity.’+Carter used the term “decoupling” to refer the idea of breaking any direct causal link between economic growth and environmental degradation; but also suggested that “dematerialisation” of manufacturing processes (i.e. the reduction of environmental resources consumed per unit of production) would be essential (2007: 227). However, if we take the manufacturing of motor cars as an example, the rate of fossil fuel consumption will always accelerate unless the percentage increases engine fuel efficiency is greater than the percentage increases in the number of cars. Therefore, since the former must exponentially decline towards zero, the logical conclusion is that we must control the demand for the latter.
  • Resource Efficiency: The Sixth Wave of Innovation(wired.com)decoupling economic growth from resource consumption. “We are moving from an old mode of operation when we were harvesting resources that were plentiful and cheap to a time when we are managing resources that are scarce and valuable.”
  • Proposal, A New Mindset for Designers: Poverty Aids Innovative Solutions(materialinnovations.wordpress.com)
    Many folks look to technology and design for answers to global ecological problems such as climate change, but I am skeptical of technological solutions because they cost money and often are a masturbatory, over-complicated solution. Designers need to stop designing for the problem to in order to procure personal rewards and start designing for the planet (which includes humans).
  • Growths Always Bring About All Benefits for The Society is Not Necessarily True: Growth Syndromes are There(socyberty.com)
    As all the gaudy elements of the market actually allures people, as it is related to the emotions, status, social prestige, and people feel great to have that product or services as a means of owning it. The craving becomes such strong and forceful that sometimes and most of the times people do not care or bother if he or she deserves the item or not.
  • You, Leadership, and the Environment(linked2leadership.com)
    Protect
    the world we live in for our children and our children’s’ families.
    Promote a
    n image of healthy, sustainable, and profitable business
    Practice the use of renewable resources and recycling to help cut costs, long run.
  • Do More With Less Or Things Will Get Ugly: Study(fastcompany.com)
    As it stands, economic growth is largely dependent on resource consumption. As a country grows, so does its use of natural–and limited–high-quality resources like oil, gold, and copper. But this is untenable in the long run, especially as growing countries like India and China model themselves increasingly on American habits of consumption (a car, two cell phones, and 30 pounds of meat for all!).
  • Myths about Sustainability(drsuneelsethi.wordpress.com)There are two major ways of reducing negative human impact and enhancing ecosystem services. One approach towards sustainability is environmental management; based largely on information gained from earth science, environmental science, and conservation biology. Another approach is management of consumption of resources, which is based largely on information gained from economics. Sustainability interfaces with economics through the social and ecological consequences of economic activity.
    +
    Public subsidies for a range of renewable energy technologies are to be cut under plans unveiled by the government on Thursday, as ministers respond to complaints of “green taxes” driving up energy bills.
  • Government stimulus measures too feeble: Stiglitz (theglobeandmail.com)
    In a pessimistic speech in Toronto, the Columbia University economist said the economy has not recovered after three years because politicians underestimated the weakness and wrongly concluded only short-term stimulus programs were needed to fix the problems.
  • Austerity is ‘suicide pact’ for major economies: Stiglitz(business.financialpost.com)
    Bloomberg
    Joseph Stiglitz.

    Austerity programs adopted by the United States and Europe are “effectively a suicide pact for our economies,” said Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz.Cuts to government spending only lead to more job losses, resulting in further slowing of demand, Mr. Stiglitz told business leaders in Toronto.

    “It’s a vicious circle,” he said.
    +

    As for the future of the euro, he said some of the biggest problems are “the absence of clear leadership” and lack of transparency by government agencies.
    For instance, Dexia SA, the large Franco-Belgian lender currently enjoying a government bailout passed a regulatory stress test only two weeks before going bankrupt. Indeed, many of the European lenders now deemed troubled passed similar stress tests with flying colours.

    The result is investors don’t know who to believe.

    “If everybody feels this way, it’s hard to see another [credit] freeze not happening,” he said.

  • Happy Planet Index (theneteconomy.wordpress.com)
    Some countries use an awful lot of resources per each year of happy life whereas others do a better job of turning resources into happy, productive lives.
  • World goes into ‘ecological debt’ (mirror.co.uk)
    Humans have exhausted nature’s supplies such as land, trees and fish for the year and its capacity to absorb waste products including carbon dioxide, and are now “eating into savings”, the Global Footprint Network said.As a result natural resources are shrinking and carbon dioxide is accumulating.
  • JOSEPH STIGLITZ’S SWITCH IN TIME: Speaking before a group of protesters in Zuccotti Park, Nobel e… (pajamasmedia.com)
    you do have a right to be indignant. Especially at those “academics” who sold their work to the highest bidder defending the system and now pretend to be shocked at how everything turned out.
  • Stiglitz on pharmaceutical prices; and the four major causes of the worsening of the national debt (americablog.com)
    Four things brought us from where we were then, huge surpluses, to where we are now.
  • Economist Stiglitz: Federal Reserve failures ‘almost unforgivable’ (colonel6.com)
    Prominent economist Joseph Stiglitz says that the Federal Reserve failed as a regulator in seeing the economic crisis coming, yet claims ignorance on the influence of groups like Bilderberg.
  • The Ugly of Footprinting (oursimplicityproject.wordpress.com)
    Kenny took a different quiz at myfootprint.org and found out we’d only need 2.93 Earths to support our lifestyle (whew, that’s a relief!). But those results showed a total footprint in global acres of 113.58! Wait a minute! What happened? Our ecological footprint went from 16.1 to 113.58 acres in ten minutes?
  • William Rees on disconnection (learningfromdogs.com)
    17-minute video interview of Dr. Rees with Thomas Bernes, Executive Director, CIGI.
    William Rees, best known in ecological economics as the originator and co-developer of ‘ecological footprint analysis’, says the United States is using four or five times its fair share of the world’s total bio-capacity. In order to bring just the present world population up to the material standards enjoyed by North Americans, we would need the biophysical equivalent of about three additional planet earths.
  • EU Resource Roadmap will not solve ecological debt crisis (3eintelligence.wordpress.com)
    One of the hidden causes behind the world’s economic and financial turmoil is without any doubt the dramatic price increases of energy, raw materials and other resources over the last ten years. Investment guru Jeremy Grantham even uses the phrase “The Great Paradigm Shift” to describe this historical shift from declining commodity prices in the 20th century to this recent trend of skyrocketing price surges. But rising prices are not the only problem. Real access, availability and the danger of resource conflicts have become other issues of concern for policymakers (see e.g. the EU’s raw materials strategy).
  • Resources used up this year (search.japantimes.co.jp)
    A clearer understanding of human consumption must include many related issues — global warming, climate change, carbon footprints and consumption — as well as the fact that consuming takes place in real time. This way of thinking puts the global economic crisis into sharp relief.A global economic recovery depends ultimately on a sufficient supply of resources for human needs. But when both the world economy and the world ecology enter into debt, the combined effects may become unpredictably difficult.+
    The possibility of individuals having an impact was underscored this summer in Japan, as individuals demonstrated that they could reduce energy usage and consumption when demand threatened to outstrip power supplies. That offers hope that humanity will not have to live in resource debt forever.

1. It cannot succeed in satisfying the basic material needs of many people, nor can it meet the immaterial needs of all people.

2. It is inefficient and ineffective in preserving natural resources.

3. It systematically destroys jobs.

  • Closing the loop: making microfinance sustainable (davegladson.com)
    Using microfinance as a development tool makes a key assumption; the model relies on increasing consumption to create economic growth.  More business activity increases the size of the pie for everybody to share from.  In an open system this would work.  However, our global economy is a closed system.  The total amount of resources, and the amount of consumption that those resources can support, is limited.  For microfinance to remain an effective tool in the long term, the loop must be closed.  Increased consumption in poorer countries must be matched by reduced consumption in richer countries.
  • A fresh, green colour for business (greennigeria.wordpress.com)
    The environmentalists are frowning at the somewhat snail-speed process of greening business, which they want reversed, in the light of emerging financially-beneficial opportunities, courtesy of initiatives aimed at mitigating and adapting to the outcome of global warming.
  • Syngenta joins Sustainability Consortium as Founding Member (prweb.com)
    “Syngenta is focused upon helping to ensure food security for a global population that will reach nine billion people by 2050,” said Jennifer Shaw, Head Sustainability, North America. “This is a very significant new opportunity for engagement to support the sustainability of agriculture and bring a balance of economic, environmental and societal benefits to the world at large and the people who grow the crops that feed us. Technologies that enable growing more from less are necessary to produce the food that will be needed to feed our increasing population and make more efficient use of our planet’s natural resources.”
  • ‘Peak stuff’ message is cold comfort – we need to embrace green technology | Tim Jackson (guardian.co.uk)
    Society is faced with a profound dilemma – one that is sharpened considerably by the twin threats of financial crisis and climate change. The dilemma is this: to resist economic growth is to risk economic and social collapse, but to pursue it is to endanger the ecosystems on which we depend for long-term survival.
  • World goes into ‘ecological debt’ (mirror.co.uk)
    The world has gone into “ecological debt”, having used up more resources and produced more waste this year than the planet can cope with, campaigners have warned.

    Humans have exhausted nature’s supplies such as land, trees and fish for the year and its capacity to absorb waste products including carbon dioxide, and are now “eating into savings”, the Global Footprint Network said.

    As a result natural resources are shrinking and carbon dioxide is accumulating.

About Marcus Ampe

Retired dancer, choreographer, choreologist. - Gepensioneerd danser, choreograaf, choreoloog.
This entry was posted in Economy, Environment and Ecology, Food, Welfare and Health and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Ecological economics in the stomach #2 Resources

  1. Pingback: The solutions generation The next generation will have to bring about major transitions in order to build a more sustainable future. | ikners.com

  2. Pingback: Ecological economics in the stomach #3 Food and Populace | Marcus' s Space

  3. Pingback: Ecological economics in the stomach #4 Water | Marcus' s Space

  4. Pingback: Is Australia’s Population having an impact on our ecosystem? « Ray'z Random Reviews

  5. Pingback: De nacht is ver gevorderd 2 Studie 1 Zijn het de laatste dagen? 1 Intro | Broeders in Christus

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s