We may wonder if all the pro-leave politicians who told many lies were prepared when they would gain control. Did the Treasury start already developing Brexit plans during the campaign?
According to Churchmouse Campanologist, a semi-retired marketing copywriter who worked in London for many years and was, until the last decade, decidedly left-wing,
One of the reasons the government is delaying triggering Article 50, which formally begins Leave proceedings with Brussels, is to give businesses time to plan for the future.
He presents here a translation of the business section of Le Monde on June 23 which had two good articles about Brexit. One of their correspondents, Eric Albert, interviewed a few British business experts (‘Le casse-tête des accords commerciaux post-Brexit’, Économie et Entreprise, p. 4).
We think it best for Britain to return as a member of the World Trade Organisation anyhow having customs and tariffs applied between the UK and EU.
He also looks at another article on the same page in Le Monde with a Q&A with Andrew Balls, fund manager at Pimco (‘”La faiblesse des salaires nourrit le rejet d’Europe“‘). Balls explained — as the title says — that the British rejected Europe because of increasingly weak salaries.
Concerning the overall financial impact of Brexit Balls replied:
The heaviest consequences would be concentrated on the British economy. The doubts about an exit process, which could last for months, would penalise investment. A recession is not out of the question, but, overall, [making] any estimates would be tricky.
We also can not go around the fact that we shall have to face political risks of the rise of Eurosceptic populists.
+
Preceding articles
Economic crisis danger for the rise of political extremism
Brexit clashes and reasons to consider to bring out the right vote
Brexit, Nexit, Vlexit and Frexit
Foreign workers and immigrants
Could Brexit lead to Frexit – or Czexit?
The newspapers from April 23 and 24 presented the worst case scenarios for British business in case of Brexit.
One of the reasons the government is delaying triggering Article 50, which formally begins Leave proceedings with Brussels, is to give businesses time to plan for the future. There are, of course, other reasons for the delay, mainly David Cameron’s resignation. He clearly said that his successor, to be decided by October, will be the one to invoke the article.
The business section of Le Monde on June 23 had two good articles about Brexit. One of their correspondents, Eric Albert, interviewed a few British business experts (‘Le casse-tête des accords commerciaux post-Brexit’, Économie et Entreprise, p. 4). Highlights follow, translation and emphases mine.
How much of British trade is with the EU?
Currently, the European Union (EU) represents 45% of British exports and clarifying the commercial trading framework…
View original post 736 more words
Thank you very much for the reblog — greatly appreciated!
LikeLike
Pingback: First sayings around the Brexit | Marcus Ampe's Space
Pingback: Brexit: Why Cameron’s campaign lost | Marcus Ampe's Space
Pingback: Wales will probably lose its EU funding #Brexit | Marcus Ampe's Space
Pingback: At the closing hours of 2016 #2 Low but also highlights | Marcus Ampe's Space
Pingback: From Guestwriters 2016 in review | From guestwriters
Pingback: 2016 in review Politics #1 Year of dissonance | Marcus Ampe's Space
Pingback: Strength does not lie in splendid isolation but in our unique union | Marcus Ampe's Space
Pingback: Brexit 5 years onwards | Marcus Ampe's Space
Pingback: Brexit, what we lost in the fire | Marcus Ampe's Space
Pingback: Wich way to go for Scotland – Some View on the World
Pingback: Russia not wanting it neighbours countries to cooperate with the West – Some View on the World
Pingback: History.com: This Day In History (January 04-1999): The euro debuts – Some View on the World
Pingback: British in 2023 found out that Brexit is not working – Some View on the World